The following is the translation of an article that appeared on tsargrad.tv on February 12, 2017, so basically five years ago, which digs into the history of the region formerly known as “Ukrainian SSR” and “Ukraine”. The actual history is quite different from the one that is usually purported in the West – a version based in the Ukrainian perception/interpretation of history.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia February 17, 2022 (Translated from Russian by Yandex)February 17, 2022
On February 17 of this year, US Ambassador J. P. was invited to the Russian Foreign Ministry.Sullivan was given the following reaction to the previously received American response on the Russian draft treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America on security guarantees:
Recently, the German tabloid Bild released a map, purporting to depict plans of Russia’s General Staff for (finally) invading Ukraine, which Russia has failed to do since 2014 despite countless predictions to the contrary.
Translated from Russian by Google. Original article is here.
The supply of weapons to Kiev from the United States and Britain is just the tip of the iceberg called “preparation for war with Russia.” Its invisible part – military bases, sabotage and cyber centers of information and psychological attacks
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg arrogantly denied Moscow the right to have its own sphere of influence and be against the entry of its neighbors into the North Atlantic Alliance. “Russia has no say in this matter, and it has no right to establish a sphere of influence by trying to control its neighbors,” he announced. But then he suddenly became emotional: “It’s a pity that Russia closed NATO offices in Moscow … We are ready to discuss sensitive issues. Including across Ukraine “.
In fact, NATO members interpret “sensitive issues on Ukraine” in their own way.
Dedicated to the numbskulls who are demanding a “mandatory vaccination”.
mRNA is an experimental technology it has been used as gene-therapy before, but never as a “vaccine”:
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal l duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The same procedure as last elections? The same procedure as every election! It is already a tradition in Kyrgyzstan to no accept results of elections in Kyrgyzstan, and have riots, regime change and calling of new elections immediately after the contested one:
Four parties demand re-election. A joint statement was made by the Ata-Meken, Uluttar Birimdigi, Social Democrats and Azattyk parties. They stated that the failures on the CEC website (https://t.me/sputnik_kyrgyzstan/47821) were a prepared falsification of the voting results. Meanwhile, Sadyr Zhaparov advised them to count the ballots manually.” Until all ballots are completely counted and parties expressing dissatisfaction are satisfied, ballots cannot be moved. If the CEC is found to be rigged, all its members will be brought to justice. They will answer with their heads,” he wrote.
So what happened this time? Apparently the website of the Central Election Commission (CEC) failed, or rather had an error:
Why did the CEC website fail? The head of the Central Election Commission explained that two programs are used to display the results: the first automatically reads data from electronic ballot boxes, and the second reduces this data for display. “To improve the visual presentation, we introduced an external table. This was done for easier visualization, but one small formula was laid incorrectly. It added two positions that should not have been added. It was immediately noticed and adjusted,” Nurzhan explained. Shaildabekova. She said there were no glitches in the main system. The head of the CEC added that the count data can be easily verified, as each observer is given a sheet with the results of the count at the site.
This is posted for future reference. The data covers the period from 2001 to 2019 (inclusive) – thus it is pre-pandemic data. As we can see from the data, the number of beds in this period have been reduced by 12%, despite the fact that the population grew by 19%, a rise in hospitalizations by 25% during the same period.
Here is another view on the number of ICU beds in the Canton of Zurich for 2018 – which is also pre-pandemic. The article raises he same points as the above (reduction of number of beds, despite growing population):
Some ten days later, we look again at the number to see whether the numbers continued to rise, supposedly due to the Delta-Variant of SarsCoV2. The data is again from the Texas Department of Health Services and current as of September 10, 2021.
As we can see, the numbers have stopped going up and have begun to come down. This is while there are still no COVID19 measures are in place – they were all lifted by Texas Governor Abbott and have not been put back in force.
We’re going to keep an eye on this situation to see how it develops during the autumn and winter.
Back in July, we looked at the situation of hospitalizations in Texas, one month after Governor Abbott lifted all COVID19 restrictions in Texas, and as was noted, there was some rise in hospitalizations.
Now over a month later, we’ll have another look to see whether hospitalizations picked up or not. The data is again from the Texas Department of Health Services and current as of August 21, 2021.
Hospitalizations did go up and almost reached peak level, but seem to be going down already. This seems to be due to the Delta-Variant of the virus, and also led to some hospitals running out of ICU beds, as the Texas Tribune writes. There are still no state-wide restrictions being re-introduced, and we’ll have to see how this situation develops.
Back in June, we looked at the situation of hospitalizations in Texas, one month after Governor Abbott lifted all COVID19 restrictions in Texas, and as was noted, there was no rise in hospitalizations.
Now almost a month later, we’ll have another look to see whether hospitalizations picked up or not. The data is again from the Texas Department of Health Services and current as of July 24, 2021.
Hospitalizations are now going up again – most likely due to the Delta-Variant of the virus, as the Texas Tribune writes. There are still no state-wide restrictions being re-introduced, but local officials in some counties have asked citizens to take additional measures to protect themselves.